25 - 05 - 2013

Ads by Google

Shout box

Turn off/on Sound Smileys History FAQ Kide Chat
panpantom: well done Simon (SV17) first time on KX mp
signaller1: full with a q!
panpantom: KC: Palace seeks a signaller
simon.vale : I'm SV17
simon.vale : Yeh - but I'm a newbie - I'll need something easy to do
panpantom: Simon are you up for KX?
simon.vale : I'm joining
panpantom: any more joining KX?
arabianights: *hurray
arabianights: huray
panpantom: KX hosting details on forum
panpantom: I'll host a KX
simon.vale : I'm going to guess he isn't going to turn up
simon.vale : maybe not..
simon.vale : Haha - its not 10pm yet - patience ;)
arabianights: that said it this does kinda require the 10pm host guy to turn up...
arabianights: :)
simon.vale : And there weren't any spare platforms in Liverpool Street either
simon.vale : I made a huge mistake with the Liverpool Street Sim - I had the Bishopsgate Tunnel closed, and there was just a huge queue of 5 trains trying to get to Bethnal Green
simon.vale : Yeh that would be good - I'm not sure I trust myself with anything more
arabianights: cause it's not really possible to make a HUGE mistake with that
arabianights: or if you're completely new it might be worth asking to do the hertford loop
simon.vale : ok
arabianights: what normally happens is everyone is assigned a panel on a first come first served basis
arabianights: you will have to speak to the host about it but they will probably not want to link with a complete newbie cause there are lots of extra issues if you are a host (which you would have to be if you wanted to link)
simon.vale : as you can link sims together can't you?
simon.vale : I also have the Royston one - so I could just be left to that one as its simple enough ;)
simon.vale : Just installed it
simon.vale : Ok :)
arabianights: download simsig kings cross (and simsig main files) then wait for thread in the forum with details for the multiplayer
simon.vale : I'm a relative newb but I don't mind trying out a signalling session. What do I need to do?
Morsey: More KX?! Im up for it :P
arabianights: moi aussi
georgerb: KX @ 10pm - count me in please
jc92: sounds like a good plan :) I could look at hosting a late night Sim circa 10pm
jimgos2005: what to do on a rainy evening lets have an mp session kx if possible

Only registered users can send messages, register or login
Forum
Private Messages

You are not logged in.

Forum Latest
Upcoming Events
There are no events in the selected category
Login Form

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: My first SPAD

My first SPAD 24 Jan 2010 13:53 #1

  • pilotman
  • pilotman's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 185
  • Thank you received: 5
Thought I would report a very rare event. A TC failure at Werrington jnc on the down Ketton caused 2 signals to go to danger. (One controlled and 1 auto). I noticed the first affected train stop and then restart at the auto, so I brought up "show auto aspects" and sure enough it was red. The next train went by in the same way, only stopping at the red controlled signal. Any comments??
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 24 Jan 2010 13:53 #2

  • pilotman
  • pilotman's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 185
  • Thank you received: 5
Thought I would report a very rare event. A TC failure at Werrington jnc on the down Ketton caused 2 signals to go to danger. (One controlled and 1 auto). I noticed the first affected train stop and then restart at the auto, so I brought up "show auto aspects" and sure enough it was red. The next train went by in the same way, only stopping at the red controlled signal. Any comments??
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 24 Jan 2010 16:35 #3

  • AndyG
  • AndyG's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 969
  • Thank you received: 146
I thought I had that happen at an auto sig at R with TCF near Huntingdon.

Wondered whether SImSig now models drivers passing red auto signal on their own authority, as in mplay can't ring clients at present.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 25 Jan 2010 14:33 #4

  • pilotman
  • pilotman's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 185
  • Thank you received: 5
That's a good point Andy - I have a vague recollection of seeing this in the forum somewhere?? Of course I am in single user. I haven't done multi for a time, but doesn't the host field all the phone calls from signals? Of course if the driver gets no reply I guess he would be justified in self-authorising.
Ray
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 25 Jan 2010 16:15 #5

  • JamesN
  • JamesN's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 131
  • Thank you received: 13
Phone Calls have gone to the relevant workstation for quite a while now, but host still is the only person who can make calls to shunters (EG Toton on Trent)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 26 Jan 2010 13:36 #6

  • clive
  • clive's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 690
  • Thank you received: 184
AndyG wrote:
Wondered whether SImSig now models drivers passing red auto signal on their own authority

No, it does not!

Can anyone reliably recreate this situation of trains SPADing? If so, please let me know how so that I can investigate.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 26 Jan 2010 18:59 #7

  • pilotman
  • pilotman's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 185
  • Thank you received: 5
Well it will need someone who can set up a TC failure. In this instance the failure affected the overlap of signal 471, which caused signals 471 and 475 to go to danger. Two trains then passed 471 at danger, only reporting a stop at 475.
I don't know if this is specific to these signals, or something generic (more likely)
Ray
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 26 Jan 2010 23:06 #8

  • clive
  • clive's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 690
  • Thank you received: 184
Do you mean the overlap of 471, or the overlap of 475, or the track circuit immediately beyond the overlap of 475 (the one that ends at the points)?

If it was the last of these, there's an explanation. When 475 is red for any reason, 471 is approach-released. Unless you were watching closely, you might have missed 471 being yellow for only a few seconds. (Real signalmen miss this as well - read the report into the Farnley Junction collision.)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 27 Jan 2010 08:00 #9

  • pilotman
  • pilotman's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Signaller
  • Posts: 185
  • Thank you received: 5
I think that's a likely explanation - it would explain why trains appeared to creep up to 471 then accelerate past. It's the TC ending at the points which was down.
Thanks for the explanation Clive
Ray (nee pilotman)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

My first SPAD 27 Jan 2010 08:51 #10

  • clive
  • clive's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 690
  • Thank you received: 184
You're welcome. You'll see this same behaviour on the fast line as well, for the same reason.

Andy: do you recall any more details of what you saw? I can't think of any special signalling around Huntingdon, but it would help to at least know which track and roughly where so that I can confirm or deny.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.169 seconds