I was going from what I have previously done in the sim rather than from personal experience or knowledge. The Wikipedia article on the station does indeed note that only the outer lines are electrified right through (P3 also has OHLE but as a terminating point only) so it looks as if there is a data error in the sim.

I'll put it up on the Bug Board so that Daza can take a look.

Thanks for the correction.

New version 7.0d is now available in the download section. Thanks to the moderators for quick upload.

For anyone playing V7.0d of this timetable & hasn't already sussed the changes. The main difference is when loco 0L69F appears there is a number on the end of the Train ID which in effect tells you what day of the week the timetable will run. EG: 1=Monday, 2=Tuesday, 3 Wednesday etc etc. Therefore removing the chances of trains appearing that run on selective days of the week. Thanks go to John(Postal) for his excellent work on the improvements to this timetable.

58050 wrote:
Pascal/John, I have come across 2 problems at the moment.

4V07 from Rover siding, The departure location is incorrect or the Line is incorrect.

At Snow Hill, 5H22 and 2M01 clash with each other in P3 at 06:33.

Barry

BarryM wrote:
Barry

Afraid it looks as if they slipped through the net as versions have gone backwards and forwards between Pascal and myself. It is very much Pascal's TT on which he has spent a huge amount of time and effort. I have been helping him with a bit of tidying up and rule manipulation in the latter stages, but it is his work that has got us this far.

According to my changelog, I amended 4V07 as "Entry point changed to Longbridge Rover (Rec/Dep)" and 5H22 as "2mins pathing added. Arr Snow Hill 06:35". I'll need to go back and check what is in the published TT as against my file version in case there are any other changes that have not carried through and then get Pascal/AndyG to update the download copy.

Thanks for the info.

Edit: Just downloaded the site version of the TT and it includes the 2 changes recorded in my log. Is the file date 02/12/11 on your copy?

Yes thanks for the notification Barry. Y thought we'd cacked as you were the first to post an issue after the V7.0d release. Although John is 'thanking' my efforts in producing this timetable, it is been improved alot due to his efforts in tidying it up as he says. John been doing all the amendments which in effect has allowed me to continue writing another Saltley timetable based on 1979-1980, which should see its first online test within a fortnight if I get as much done as I think I can. But will look into these 2 issues for y7ou Barry. Thank You.

postal wrote:
Oops! Sorry John, I had "c" version loaded. I'll try "d" for you. I thought I had updated my files.

"d" version has corrected the required changes so far. I'll continue checking.

Barry

Hi John,
I found another small anomaly at Moor Street/Snow Hill. 2S09 is ringing for the signal at Moor St at 09:15 to move to P2 Snow Hill. However 2C09 is not due to leave P2 till 09:15. Looking back, I am wondering whether 2S08 should have gone into P3 which divides forming 2C09 as P3 is vacant from 08:55 to 09:20. P1 would be no good as it would cause clashes,

Barry

Barry

I can't speak for Pascal who put together the TT in the first place, but I noticed that when going through the TT and decided to leave it as the conflict was so minor. 2S09 is due Snow Hill P2 09:16 - 09:19H which is a long dwell time for a unit on a through train so if anyone is desperately worried the WTT can be tweaked to show Moor Street dep 09:16, Snow Hill arr 09:17; I don't expect the public TT would be tweaked to show a similar change. I wouldn't expect to post a new copy of the TT unless it contains a few more changes than that.

Thanks for the nudge, though. The name of the game is to get a TT that works rather than being a bit precious about one's own little baby.

John/Barry, the times are as per the WTT. The long stop as you put it could be something to do with regulation or possibly the inbound unit was formed of more than one(which doesn't show in WTT) & subsequently splits. In which case would definately mean an alteration to the tt. Confirmation would have to come from certain players who have local knowledge of the services mentioned, unless someone has an SWB for Snow Hill at that time period. But as John states best left as it is. In all respects thanks for the notification Barry.