Correct me if i'm wrong, but many of the posts in this topic talking about new sims, aren't necessarily talking about in development sims. There are some sims that are not played very often that would have been perfect for a meet where no "sneak-peeks" or similar were happening.

I think a lot of people have agreed that the sheer cost of a meet sometimes outweighs the benefits. As an example, I spent in the region of £40-50 last week to go to the meet, yes I enjoyed it, yes I put names to faces etc., but I was still playing some of the most overplayed sims that have been created. Is that a testament to their quality? Yes. To the work that has been put into them? Yes. All of the released sims are up to a high standard of quality that could have easily been used at the meet that aren't played as often. This would have satisfied most people. Those who have gone to the meet to run a panel alongside other signallers, and also those who have gone for the more social side of it.

If i'm going to be honest, as much as I enjoyed the meet, would I pay £50 to play Kings Cross again? I doubt it. Would I have paid the same to play a less played sim such as South Humberside? Quite possibly.

Those going or who are minded to go, could have a poll of the available Sims and see what people might like to have played.

Peter

Peter Bennet wrote:
that sounds good to me, would there also be a poll for timetables? personally my vote would for instance be a 70s/80s timetable, however if the majority would prefer a 2009 one then fairs fair.

jc92 wrote:
The person who sets the poll can decide the question.

Peter