Page 1 of 1
| NLL 2.102 21/11/2009 at 11:17 #281 | |
Jsun
212 posts |
Noticed NLL has disappeared from the download section in all form, is it undergoing revision or has it been rescinded?
Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 21/11/2009 at 11:17 #4292 | |
|
Jsun
212 posts |
Noticed NLL has disappeared from the download section in all form, is it undergoing revision or has it been rescinded?
Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 21/11/2009 at 11:36 #4294 | |
|
Tallington
254 posts |
Likewise with Peterborough. We will just have to wait and see ... ;) Ken Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 21/11/2009 at 11:51 #4297 | |
|
AnyFile
101 posts |
I suppose it is waiting refresh version. If you want to get the old version (the one that was available on the old forum), look at this page on the wiki: download Note: for some other simulations the download links may link to an old version, while a newer one has been realised (after this page was made) Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 21/11/2009 at 13:24 #4301 | |
GeoffM
6282 posts |
I was hoping to release it soon, but I've since been given some information about the "new" Stratford layout. Rather than the hybrid previous versions I want to produce different era simulations, switchable at start-up like some of the recent simulations (1980s, 1990s, 2010 kind of thing). So it may be a little longer yet.
SimSig Boss Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 14/01/2010 at 12:55 #5867 | |
|
Charlytos
268 posts |
GeoffM, while we wait will be released the new NLL version that you are creating, would you can to put here any images of map from new version to have any idea how will be the same?
Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 18/01/2010 at 12:51 #5956 | |
|
Signaller@Amsterdam
76 posts |
Charlytos said:GeoffM, while we wait will be released the new NLL version that you are creating, would you can to put here any images of map from new version to have any idea how will be the same? Thank the lord for Bablefish tanslations. :: Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 18/01/2010 at 13:21 #5957 | |
|
Charlytos
268 posts |
Ignore signaller@Amsterdam, why you put that rare reply over my previous reply?. I only put to him if was possible would put any images of new NLL version. My English is short, but I put clare the best that could the idea. Sorry if you didn't understand it well. Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 31/01/2010 at 08:26 #6349 | |
|
leigh
51 posts |
Is there an intention for the next version of NLL to be chainable to the latest version of KX?
Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 31/01/2010 at 09:26 #6351 | |
|
fotorob
23 posts |
Signaller@Amsterdam said:What's a tanslation ? Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 31/01/2010 at 16:37 #6360 | |
|
Charlytos
268 posts |
fotorob, tanslation = translation!
Log in to reply |
| NLL 2.102 31/01/2010 at 16:53 #6361 | |
|
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
Charlytos, fotorob was having a joke, a laugh. Signaller@Amsterdam posted his [rude!] message saying that he apparently needed to use Babelfish (which is a free to use online translation service) to understand your post but he either had a typo or incorrectly spelled 'Translations' as 'Tanslations'. In reality I was able to understand your post without a problem (and without needing to use Babelfish!) and I'm not very impressed that Signaller@Amsterdam made that post since it is highly uncommunity spirited of him. Español (la traducción proporcionó por Babelfish); Charlytos, fotorob tenía una broma, una risa. Signaller@Amsterdam fijó el suyo [grosero!] decir del mensaje que él necesitó al parecer utilizar Babelfish (que está un libre de utilizar servicio de traducción en línea) para entender su poste solamente él tenía un error tipográfico o deletreó incorrectamente ' Traducciones' como ' Taducciones'. En realidad podía entender su poste sin un problema (y sin la necesidad utilizar Babelfish!) e I' m no muy impresionado que Signaller@Amsterdam hizo ese poste puesto que es altamente uncommunity enérgico de él. Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |