Page 1 of 1
| Routing Problems 06/03/2012 at 18:41 #30405 | |
Quizman
276 posts |
Doing a new timetable (1980s version) and having problems with timetable acceptance on a few routes namely:- 1. Horton SB > Wrawby Jcn > Barnetby WJ63rev) and/or > Down Sidings 2. Barnetby BE27 > Down Sidings 3. West Burton Cripple Sidings towards Clarborough. Trains go in OK via GF83 but using the reverse same locations for train to come out brings up timetable error. Any assistance appreciated. Thanks Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 06/03/2012 at 22:02 #30411 | |
|
Noisynoel
989 posts |
" said:Doing a new timetable (1980s version) and having problems with timetable acceptance on a few routes namely:- .......At present there is no reversing location at WJ63 (Ask Chris nicely!!). The Down sidings are beyond the ground frame and are, as yet, not in the sim. The sidings above the Up Goods (BE33/BE34) are the reception sidings (Route Holton - wrawby - barnetby recep Sdgs) " said:
......Refer to point 1 " said:
.......Paths into/out of cripple sidings not yet completed Hope that helps Noisynoel Last edited: 06/03/2012 at 22:03 by Noisynoel Reason: Incapable of using Quote facility Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Quizman |
| Re: Routing Problems 06/03/2012 at 22:27 #30413 | |
|
Lardybiker
771 posts |
Thanks Noel for answering those.... '80's mode for South Humberside is on the back burner while I sort out modern mode first. Horton currently isn't included as a location so you may need to use Holton-le-Moor as the entry point instead with appropriately adjusted timings. However, if someone can Mantis that, I can make sure Horton gets added for '80's mode. The Down sidings and Up sidings GF's are both be operational in the update though in modern mode, the Up sidings GF has little affect as its actually disconnected. WJ63 is already included as reversing point with appropriate paths in the update as is the route from BE27 to Down sidings. As Noel said, the Cripples siding in the current version are not usable. The code in the update for this art an advanced stage and testing is on-going as we speak. The cripples sidings will be operational when it is finally released. Last edited: 06/03/2012 at 22:28 by Lardybiker Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Quizman |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/03/2012 at 15:00 #30435 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
Thanks guys, just wanted to check to make sure it was the sim and not me being brain dead :lol: The WTT I have has had to be severely adjusted to take into account layout changes since 1971 not least the single line from Cleethorpes! I shall persevere with the timetable doing adjustments as a v.1 and if really inspired keep the original as a further version when the update is available. No, I'm not going to ask the obvious, like the timetable - it will be ready when it's ready. Cheers Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/03/2012 at 15:09 #30437 | |
jc92
3629 posts 
|
i thought the grimsby- cleethorpes line was singled in 1985 when all the boxes on that section closed and pasture street recieved pt.1 of its NX panel, not 1971
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/03/2012 at 17:16 #30446 | |
|
birchy74
151 posts |
Your right jc92 the line was singled in 1985
Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/03/2012 at 17:18 #30448 | |
|
Noisynoel
989 posts |
I think you'll find (And please correct me if I am - after all the missus does frequently), that the refernce to 1971 is the date that the TT is being created for, not the date that the line was singled.
Noisynoel Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/03/2012 at 19:19 #30453 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
" said:I think you'll find (And please correct me if I am - after all the missus does frequently), that the refernce to 1971 is the date that the TT is being created for, not the date that the line was singled.Absolutely spot on Holmes Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 09/03/2012 at 16:47 #30499 | |
onlydjw
456 posts |
Horton SB - that's not on my list for Lincolnshire. I have Howsham SB up to 1989, when it, Claxby and Moortown closed and the block section was extended between Wrawby Jn and Holton le Moor. If it's Howsham you're thinking of Quizman, then for note Chris - it's known about (we've had numberous discussions)! God bless, Daniel Wilson Last edited: 09/03/2012 at 16:56 by onlydjw Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 09/03/2012 at 19:33 #30504 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
My typo - sorry meant Holton le Moor
Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 05/04/2012 at 19:25 #31275 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
Have another routing problem which is driving me mad. Whats the correct routing for down trips i.e. from Appleby into Frodingham Depot? Have tried direct, indirect and by reversing at various signals to no avail. Is this one of the routing bugs or is it me? Probably the latter but you never know 
Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 05/04/2012 at 22:22 #31280 | |
BarryM
2158 posts |
" said:Have another routing problem which is driving me mad. Whats the correct routing for down trips i.e. from Appleby into Frodingham Depot? Have tried direct, indirect and by reversing at various signals to no avail. Is this one of the routing bugs or is it me? Probably the latter but you never know :unsure:No bug! Route train on Down Main to Sig S45 on Up GDS LP, then into Frodingham Depot. Note, Scunthorpe FD is GOODS YARD. To get to this yard, route from Sig S45 or Sig S341(DM) to ► in goods yard. Barry Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Last edited: 05/04/2012 at 22:50 by BarryM Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 05/04/2012 at 23:16 #31282 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
/quote: Route train on Down Main to Sig S45 on Up GDS LP, then into Frodingham Depot. /unquote errr nope. Validation fails 'path not found from Appleyby to S45(rev). 
Last edited: 05/04/2012 at 23:17 by Quizman Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 05/04/2012 at 23:19 #31283 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
[quote= Route train on Down Main to Sig S45 on Up GDS LP, then into Frodingham Depot. Barry[/quote] errrr nope. Validation fails 'path not found from Appleby to S45(rev)'
Last edited: 05/04/2012 at 23:20 by Quizman Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 06/04/2012 at 03:45 #31285 | |
|
BarryM
2158 posts |
" said:[quote= Route train on Down Main to Sig S45 on Up GDS LP, then into Frodingham Depot.errrr nope. Validation fails 'path not found from Appleby to S45(rev)' :([/quote] You have me confused! What are you trying to do? Create a timetable? Here is the timetable that does validate' BARNETBY --:-- 00/00 P3 FL WRAWBY JN --:-- 00/00 FL ELSHAM --:-- 00/00 APPLEBY LC --:-- 00/00 TRENT JN --:-- 00/00 SCUNTHORPE FD --:-- 00/00 or Frodingham Depot Barry Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Last edited: 06/04/2012 at 03:51 by BarryM Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 06/04/2012 at 13:13 #31298 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
Barry Sorry old fruit but that does not work for Frodingham Depot. Yes its OK for FD. As I said above it seems that any routing to Frodingham by direct or indirect means just refuses to validate. Steve Edit - there are no problems routing from s45 to Frodingham e.g. light engine shunt from Up Goods Loop its just trains approaching from Appleby direction. Last edited: 06/04/2012 at 14:07 by Quizman Reason: Clarification Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 06/04/2012 at 21:54 #31338 | |
|
BarryM
2158 posts |
" said:BarrySteve, Sorry you do get the validation error for the Depot. However, if you cancel the Error, the timetable will be saved. Note, this only applies to using the F4 function. Barry Barry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/04/2012 at 09:17 #31341 | |
Steamer
3920 posts |
" said:The TT will save, but I don't think the train will enter since it has invalid timetable data- it will appear red if you run a TT analysis. "Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 07/04/2012 at 14:44 #31352 | |
|
Quizman
276 posts |
" said:" said:Absolutely correct.The TT will save, but I don't think the train will enter since it has invalid timetable data- it will appear red if you run a TT analysis. The only way to accomplish this move as far as I can make out is to send loco to Scunthorpe P2 and reverse back to s45 and thence to Frodingham. Bit of a long winded way of doing things but that is the only one that validates, unless of course someone knows different........
Last edited: 07/04/2012 at 14:44 by Quizman Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 10/04/2012 at 08:43 #31441 | |
|
onlydjw
456 posts |
This was one of the known issues (or series of issues) with pathing and routing around the Scunthorpe area, and has been fixed for the future release. Various people have given the suggested work arounds, which are a little laborious, but are what we suggest for the current release version of the sim.
God bless, Daniel Wilson Last edited: 10/04/2012 at 08:46 by onlydjw Log in to reply |
| Re: Routing Problems 24/04/2012 at 08:44 #31750 | |
|
Mickster66
84 posts |
" said:Horton SB - that's not on my list for Lincolnshire. I have Howsham SB up to 1989, when it, Claxby and Moortown closed and the block section was extended between Wrawby Jn and Holton le Moor. Indeed "Horton" does not exist in the local area. However, in that list of signalboxes North Kelsey has been missed out. During my time working on the footplate in North Lincolnshire/South Humberside the Lincoln route signalboxes were Howsham, North Kelsey, Moortown, Holton-le-Moor, Claxby, Market Rasen, Wickenby, Snelland, Stainton (gate-box only - not a block post), Langworth, Reepham, Monks Abbey and Lincoln Pelham St. Market Rasen was the first signalbox to go - even before the resignalling took place. Log in to reply |