Upcoming Games

kings cross 2004 Busy 22/07/2017 14:00:00 - tjfrancis

Upcoming Events

Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (signalling) > Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure

Page 1 of 1

Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 13/07/2017 at 03:08 #96356
MikeW
Avatar
64 posts
Just seeking information from the real-life signallers on the forum, if I may.

As an example, let's say that a farmer has rung up wanting to cross with a heavy vehicle, but the pattern of traffic is such that there is no suitable break for 30 minutes or more. Would the usual procedure be to say 'Sorry, no can do at the moment. Is there anything else agricultural you can do for a while?' or would the signaller aim to get him across even at the risk of delaying a train? Is there a general NR policy or is it left to local discretion?

Very grateful for any insights
Mike

Log in to reply
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 13/07/2017 at 21:02 #96368
Mikehax
Avatar
7 posts
MikeW in post 96356 said:
Just seeking information from the real-life signallers on the forum, if I may.

As an example, let's say that a farmer has rung up wanting to cross with a heavy vehicle, but the pattern of traffic is such that there is no suitable break for 30 minutes or more. Would the usual procedure be to say 'Sorry, no can do at the moment. Is there anything else agricultural you can do for a while?' or would the signaller aim to get him across even at the risk of delaying a train? Is there a general NR policy or is it left to local discretion?

Very grateful for any insights
Mike
In my area trains always have priority. At my previous box due to the timetable having gone to pot, I once had a farmer with a herd of cows waiting for almost 60 minutes to find a suitable 4 minute margin that he was requesting.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: MikeW
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 14/07/2017 at 18:00 #96384
Steamer
Avatar
2332 posts
Mikehax in post 96368 said:
MikeW in post 96356 said:
Just seeking information from the real-life signallers on the forum, if I may.

As an example, let's say that a farmer has rung up wanting to cross with a heavy vehicle, but the pattern of traffic is such that there is no suitable break for 30 minutes or more. Would the usual procedure be to say 'Sorry, no can do at the moment. Is there anything else agricultural you can do for a while?' or would the signaller aim to get him across even at the risk of delaying a train? Is there a general NR policy or is it left to local discretion?

Very grateful for any insights
Mike
In my area trains always have priority. At my previous box due to the timetable having gone to pot, I once had a farmer with a herd of cows waiting for almost 60 minutes to find a suitable 4 minute margin that he was requesting.
Out of interest, does there come a point where it's worth delaying a train to mitigate the risk of the farmer ignoring you and crossing anyway, or not bothering to ask next time? Granted it's more likely to be an issue if the farmer's driving a vehicle rather than crossing with livestock.

Last edited: 14/07/2017 at 18:00 by Steamer
Reason: None given

Log in to reply
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 14/07/2017 at 20:26 #96386
Colourlight
Avatar
98 posts
If I was to delay a train in order to allow a member of the public to cross the railway at a user worked crossing, my manager would not be Impressed. If there is insufficient time to safely use the crossing then the road user is told that there is a train approaching and that he/she should phone back after it has gone past or another similar appropriate response,
Log in to reply
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 14/07/2017 at 21:35 #96388
Dick
Avatar
181 posts
Do you seriously think that an hour is an acceptable time for a member of public to have to wait to cross for the sake of delaying a train a couple of minutes? No wonder Joe Public jump crossings.
Log in to reply
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 15/07/2017 at 04:53 #96389
ThatManCalledAr
Avatar
9 posts
Dick in post 96388 said:
Do you seriously think that an hour is an acceptable time for a member of public to have to wait to cross for the sake of delaying a train a couple of minutes? No wonder Joe Public jump crossings.
There's a few minutes for a member of the public, then there's 10-20minutes for a herd of cows.....

If it's all gone to pot, bell 7-5-5 and go down the pub.
Log in to reply
Occupational crossings - prototypical procedure 16/07/2017 at 00:37 #96405
MrBitsy
Avatar
96 posts
Dick in post 96388 said:
Do you seriously think that an hour is an acceptable time for a member of public to have to wait to cross for the sake of delaying a train a couple of minutes? No wonder Joe Public jump crossings.
It is safe to cross when it is safe to cross - trains are not delayed.

Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: DriverCurran, ThatManCalledAr