Page 1 of 1
Timetable 2004 22/07/2011 at 20:43 #18194 | |
delticfan
476 posts |
Hi all, just downloaded Timetable 2004 and told by the sim that it's not the TT for this simulation. Confused unless I've missed something? Just finished a session with the default TT with no problems. Have downloaded the revised system files if that would make any difference. Haven't tried downloads for any of the other TTs yet in case there's a problem. Any comments appreciated. Cheers, Mal.
Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 22/07/2011 at 20:52 #18196 | |
UKTrainMan
1803 posts |
Well I'm stumped. Downloaded and tested and got the same result. Even tested it with previous version of Peterborough (Version 2.102) and got the same problem. May have to give this timetable a miss, for now at least, and hope someone can fix it?!!
Any views and / or opinions expressed by myself are from me personally and do not represent those of any company I either work for or am a consultant for. Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 22/07/2011 at 21:07 #18197 | |
delticfan
476 posts |
" said:Well I'm stumped. Downloaded and tested and got the same result. Even tested it with previous version of Peterborough (Version 2.102) and got the same problem. May have to give this timetable a miss, for now at least, and hope someone can fix it?!!Thanks for that, just wondered if i'd done something wrong. I did notice on the timetable list after 'select new game' that it gave other options such as '2004 extras for KX' and 'Winter 2004'. I selected one option that said 'extra trains' and got an incident report showing a list of trains running with heavy delays. The start time was listed as 07.00 but the first couple of trains I clicked on had times around 03.00 and thereabouts. Reckon I'll join you in being stumped. Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 23/07/2011 at 06:05 #18201 | |
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
It is a really old one but I've just tested it on a current BETA and it loads OK and on conversion to txt the header looks fine SIM=Peterborough; is what it needs if anyone wants to check. Otherwise not sure what to suggest. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 23/07/2011 at 06:19 #18202 | |
hayleysmith
14 posts |
Was it the 2004 extra services timetable download? I believe one of the timetables supplied in that download is for Kings Cross lol!
Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 23/07/2011 at 07:27 #18206 | |
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
That could be the problem! As above a quick conversion to txt and look at the SIM= data will reveal all. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 23/07/2011 at 07:36 #18208 | |
delticfan
476 posts |
Hi Peter, I tried a download of both the headings for 2004, the one with extra services and the one just labelled Summer 2004. No luck with running either. Not too sure what SIM=Peterborough means though, is it something else I need to download? Cheers, mal.
Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 23/07/2011 at 07:42 #18209 | |
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
" said:Hi Peter, I tried a download of both the headings for 2004, the one with extra services and the one just labelled Summer 2004. No luck with running either. Not too sure what SIM=Peterborough means though, is it something else I need to download? Cheers, mal.To understand Sim= you convert the thing to a .txt file and that's the code that tells you which Sim it's for. It's a bit complicated to explain but you need Convdata program. If someone familiar with the program and and who has the problem can check for you that might shed some light, other than that I don't know what to suggest. I may have some time tomorrow to look into it. Sorry I can't be much more help at this time. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
Re: Timetable 2004 24/07/2011 at 17:19 #18285 | |
sloppyjag
480 posts |
Just got a chance to check this and, as hayleysmith suspected, SIM=KingsX.
Planotransitophobic! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: hayleysmith |