Page 1 of 2
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 11:37 #76808 | |
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
Contains no Lincoln, i wish there was a simulation based around Lincoln. On northern part of going past Lincoln it ends at South Humberside. The eastern part is Skegness, full of AOCL's. Thanks to Roadrunner for the mockup software, it is black and white so i had to color the black and white mockup in Paint. Mockups: Skegness Station:  Wainfleet:  Thorpe Culvert:  Train passing Thorpe Culvert  Note, the train picture is actually not a simulation, it's also a mockup. I made it look like a simulation for it to be nice. Pretend description: 1W18 non stop pass Thorpe Culvert from Skegness to Boston. I plan to make a game like SimSig in Powerpoint. It will have Lincoln and about 10 simulations. Decide which they should be. Thats all. I'll post my own reply here if i make more mockups. Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 12:17 #76809 | |
jc92
3683 posts 
|
Skegness needs a distant signal. I think one train an hour could get a bit tedious. Lincoln mechanical would be good. I think the SCC will be off limits. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 12:55 #76810 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
I'll make Lincoln mechanical if i can find out whether it is not in Conflict of Interest, i'll ask Geoff.
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 13:05 #76811 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
Why does it matter to you if it's a conflict of interest for Geoff? Unless you're working with him, I can't see why it would be.
Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 13:12 #76812 | |
headshot119
4869 posts |
I'm fairly sure mechanical boxed wouldn't be a conflict of interest anyway.
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 17:00 #76824 | |
DaveHarries
1285 posts |
" said:I'll make Lincoln mechanical if i can find out whether it is not in Conflict of Interest, i'll ask Geoff. Lincoln is on the CoI list. http://www.SimSig.co.uk/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=usertrack:faq:areas_that_can_not_be_simulated Saying that, so was Marylebone and we got that in the end. Dave Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 17:06 #76826 | |
|
jc92
3683 posts
|
" said:" said:Lincoln SCC not the previous mechanical boxesI'll make Lincoln mechanical if i can find out whether it is not in Conflict of Interest, i'll ask Geoff. "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 17:23 #76827 | |
Steamer
3981 posts
|
It doesn't matter anyway- he's just making a mock-up, not a simulation...
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q) Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Trainfan344 |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 19:39 #76831 | |
|
jimbolimbo9
11 posts |
How do you make those mock-ups? Would love to make some myself
Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 12/10/2015 at 19:52 #76833 | |
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
" said:How do you make those mock-ups? Would love to make some myselfSee here. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 02:22 #76838 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
Hello again, i have done Lincoln mockup. It's mechanical but has modern crossings, also it was halogen when it had semaphores. Now it's LED. However has halogen pedestrian light.
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 04:44 #76839 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
My new signalling IECC simulation will be written on Scratch, it's more simpler. It will include Lincoln SCC. The Lincoln map will be called Lincolnshire. It will include all my mockups.
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 04:53 #76841 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
Vote for features: Functional crossings Yes/No RETB Yes/No ERTMS Yes/No Absolute block with working bells Yes/No Vote for maps: ECML Yes/No WCML Yes/No Cambrian Line Yes/No West Highland Line Yes/No Great Eastern Main Line Yes/No Great Western Main Line Yes/No The features in menu will be: Select a panel/box in a simulation, whole signalling centre mode: includes all panels. There will be also: Set frequency of calls from crossings. This is just a concept. I'll return with more mockups. Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 05:34 #76842 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
From the above I'm a little confused as to what you are intending to do. Is it more mock-ups, in which case what do you mean by "functional" or are you intending to build Sims, in which case should you be using our forum as a [potential] competitor? Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply The following user said thank you: scottlowes |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 05:46 #76843 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
I'll make some more mockups after school.
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 05:55 #76844 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
I'm still not clear as to what your intentions are, is it purely mock-ups or are you intending to try and build working Sims in some form? You refer to mock-ups but also use words such as "functional" and "simulation" and say "This is just a concept. I'll return with more mockups.". From which I infer you maybe intending to do more than just mock-ups. I'm not saying you can't use this forum to advertise your intentions (Geoff would have to take a view on that and did agree to semaphore simulations a while ago) but it'd be nice to know. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 11:54 #76845 | |
|
TomOF
452 posts |
I'm not sure if you are aware but the layout was also considerably different when Lincoln still had it's semaphores.
Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 12:51 #76846 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
" said:You refer to mock-ups but also use words such as "functional" and "simulation" and say "This is just a concept. I'll return with more mockups.". From which I infer you maybe intending to do more than just mock-ups.There's also strange sentences like: Quote: I plan to make a game like SimSig in Powerpoint. It will have Lincoln and about 10 simulations.How does one make a game in Powerpoint? Log in to reply The following user said thank you: GoochyB |
| Lincolnshire 13/10/2015 at 15:14 #76848 | |
|
TimTamToe
664 posts |
" said:Trains wouldn't enter from a depot but spiral in from the top corner with a whoooshhhh obviously :whistle: Last edited: 13/10/2015 at 15:14 by TimTamToe Log in to reply The following users said thank you: Temple Meads, GoochyB, kaiwhara, flabberdacks, LucasLCC, scottlowes, Trainfan344, Peter Bennet, postal |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 06:31 #76856 | |
|
NewBuildmini432
48 posts |
Fix me, it is was before bed the Lincoln so i forgot controls, actually let it be a CK Crossing Keeper type crossings, since i do not plan in Lincoln a centre controlling crossings, it is not a SCC, so if it was and it had no conflict of interest, i would add colour signals. So the signal boxes are keepers. Makin more mockups, was late for school so i can't go there. This time it's gonna be Saxilby
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS. Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 06:33 #76857 | |
kaiwhara
587 posts |
" said:Fix me, it is was before bed the Lincoln so i forgot controls, actually let it be a CK Crossing Keeper type crossings, since i do not plan in Lincoln a centre controlling crossings, it is not a SCC, so if it was and it had no conflict of interest, i would add colour signals. So the signal boxes are keepers. Makin more mockups, was late for school so i can't go there. This time it's gonna be SaxilbyIs it just me or did this post make no sense whatsoever? :S Sorry guys, I am in the business of making people wait! Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 08:10 #76859 | |
northroad
872 posts |
" said:" said:It's quite definitely you, as it obviously made perfect sense to the member who posted it........Fix me, it is was before bed the Lincoln so i forgot controls, actually let it be a CK Crossing Keeper type crossings, since i do not plan in Lincoln a centre controlling crossings, it is not a SCC, so if it was and it had no conflict of interest, i would add colour signals. So the signal boxes are keepers. Makin more mockups, was late for school so i can't go there. This time it's gonna be SaxilbyIs it just me or did this post make no sense whatsoever? :S 
Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 08:59 #76860 | |
|
Danny252
1461 posts |
If I followed it correctly, he's currently making more mockups instead of being at school, due to being "late" and hence being unable to go to school for some unexplained reason.
Last edited: 14/10/2015 at 08:59 by Danny252 Log in to reply The following user said thank you: Trainfan344 |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 09:59 #76863 | |
|
northroad
872 posts |
" said:Vote for features:This was the earlier post that had me confused especially the vote for maps section. It appears that a simulation or mock up for the EML/WCML/Cambrian Line/West Highland Line/Great Eastern Main Line and Great Western Mainline is on the agenda.....or am I totally off the beaten track.... Log in to reply |
| Lincolnshire 14/10/2015 at 10:44 #76869 | |
|
Peter Bennet
5400 posts |
" said:If I followed it correctly, he's currently making more mockups instead of being at school, due to being "late" and hence being unable to go to school for some unexplained reason."Eleven minutes late, there was a problem with a level crossing." as Reginald Perrin might have said. Peter I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs! Log in to reply The following users said thank you: GoochyB, ajax103 |