Google Maps

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (anything else rail-oriented) > Google Maps

Page 1 of 1

Google Maps 01/05/2014 at 20:02 #59914
postal
Avatar
5197 posts
I happened to be using Google Maps on part of the UK at a fairly high zoom level today and noticed that where a railway line was displayed things were now showing down to individual track level (including things like crossovers, loops, sidings etc.) so it was almost at the Quail level. Most of the places I then looked at seemed to be pretty accurate to the extent that I only spotted the omission of 2 crossovers in the middle of a long stretch of plain track on the ECML. However, that was by no means an exhaustive survey.

Does anyone know if Google Maps is now reliable enough to use as a reference when checking on anything at that level of detail?

Edit: May be work in progress as Durham displays neither loops nor crossovers.

“In life, there is always someone out there, who won’t like you, for whatever reason, don’t let the insecurities in their lives affect yours.” – Rashida Rowe
Last edited: 01/05/2014 at 20:07 by postal
Log in to reply
Google Maps 01/05/2014 at 20:08 #59915
GW43125
Avatar
495 posts
" said:
I happened to be using Google Maps on part of the UK at a fairly high zoom level today and noticed that where a railway line was displayed things were now showing down to individual track level (including things like crossovers, loops, sidings etc.) so it was almost at the Quail level. Most of the places I then looked at seemed to be pretty accurate to the extent that I only spotted the omission of 2 crossovers in the middle of a long stretch of plain track on the ECML. However, that was by no means an exhaustive survey.

Does anyone know if Google Maps is now reliable enough to use as a reference when checking on anything at that level of detail?

Edit: May be work in progress as Durham displays neither loops nor crossovers.
I would not advise on google maps. If you are looking for track and xover details, I would advise you check out platform 5's track atlas. It has detail of every mainline section of track.

Hope this helps,
DSW.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: postal
Google Maps 01/05/2014 at 20:09 #59916
Steamer
Avatar
3929 posts
It seems to be good at showing the number of tracks, but crossovers etc. are hopelessly inaccurate. To be honest, you'd be better using the satellite view.
"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: postal
Google Maps 01/05/2014 at 22:04 #59920
Danny252
Avatar
1461 posts
The track details are also quite outdated in places - at least 10 years in some cases - and there are missing or misaligned parts. From a quick glance, Paddington-Old Oak Common is riddled with mistakes and missing tracks.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: postal