Conflict of interest

You are here: Home > Forum > Wishlist > Simulation wish list > Conflict of interest

Page 1 of 1

Conflict of interest 04/10/2015 at 10:44 #76543
Andrew G
Avatar
550 posts 		Does this list need to be updated given the recent release of Rugby SCC?

http://www.SimSig.co.uk/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=usertrack:faq:areas_that_can_not_be_simulated

Background to my post is I was going to add a Stafford (Rugby ROC) and Stoke SC thread to the wish list.

If the Stafford desk at Rubgy ROC can be developed in the future it will be relatively small and it might be an idea to combine it with a Stoke SC simulation giving desks as follows:

Colwich, Stafford, Norton Bridge, Stoke South, Stoke North

Interestingly Stoke isn't listed as a potential conflict of interest.
Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Stephen Fulcher
Conflict of interest 04/10/2015 at 16:50 #76563
Stephen Fulcher
Avatar
2028 posts 		It seems like someone has already edited Rugby SCC out Andrew.

This is an interesting issue as most new installations would have formerly made it onto the list, but there are a number of formerly-banned areas that have now been released.
Log in to reply
Conflict of interest 04/10/2015 at 17:41 #76571
Trainfan344
Avatar
262 posts 		" said:
It seems like someone has already edited Rugby SCC out Andrew.

This is an interesting issue as most new installations would have formerly made it onto the list, but there are a number of formerly-banned areas that have now been released.
Could it be as the areas are re-signalled over to ROCs Geoff's conflict of interest no longer applies because he worked on the old signalling systems?
Log in to reply
Conflict of interest 04/10/2015 at 19:44 #76579
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts 		That Wiki page needs fixing / moving, the URL is areas that *can* not be simulated whereas the topic contained is about areas that *may* not be simulated. Two totally different meanings.
Log in to reply
Conflict of interest 04/10/2015 at 20:09 #76581
headshot119
Avatar
4869 posts 		" said:
That Wiki page needs fixing / moving, the URL is areas that *can* not be simulated whereas the topic contained is about areas that *may* not be simulated. Two totally different meanings.
Well as anyone can contribute to the Wiki how about you fix it then :whistle:
"Passengers for New Lane, should be seated in the rear coach of the train " - Opinions are my own and not those of my employer
Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Trainfan344, Peter Bennet
Back