Page 1 of 1
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 11:35 #158144 | |
Giantray
344 posts |
"Deleted due to condescending remarks from another Simsigger."
Professionalism mean nothing around a bunch of Amatuer wannabees! Last edited: 13/08/2024 at 11:24 by Giantray Reason: None given Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 11:53 #158145 | |
madaboutrains
315 posts |
These crossings are operated by the signaller at Beckington I believe so inaffect acting as a crossing keeper for Doncaster. Putting a reminder on these signals wouldnt do anything for this reason. Attached a photo of the real panel. Post has attachments. Log in to view them. RIP Feltham Panel 1 Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 14:32 #158148 | |
clive
2775 posts |
Looking at that photo, D760 is an auto, so collaring it won't do anything. (Collars work on route setting, not aspect controls.) The "oi!" phone calls only apply to AHB, ABCL, AOCL, MCL, and TEL crossings, not MCBs (whether CCTV or not). So there's something odd going on with those crossings. Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 17:45 #158150 | |
jc92
3675 posts |
Giantray in post 158144 said:Whilst playing Doncaster Station Simsig, several times having collared up (placing reminder appliances) on signals at Danger protecting crossings on the Up & Down Lincoln lines, having given permission for large loads, slow vehicles etc to cross, I was getting phone calls with message, I thought you told me it was safe. Investigating further I discovered the following faults.How long has this been a Simsig feature? I didn't realise you could collar 3rd party controlled/slotted signals to prevent them clearing. is this some sort of compromise vs real life where it doesn't work that way? "We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 18:33 #158153 | |
flabberdacks
619 posts |
My friend, none of those are controlled signals. Your only options to protect those crossings are controlled signals at Bessacarr Jn (up line) and the emergency replacement button on D757 near Broomston (down line). The signals you refer to are all automatic, whether they have the permissive plate displayed or otherwise. I will leave it up to a railwayman of your experience to know what happens when you put a block on an automatic signal. Piping hot regards, Flabberdacks Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 18:45 #158154 | |
JamesN
1599 posts |
In reality, I suspect the signaller on Doncaster Panel would be able to instruct the crossing keeper to maintain their signals at Danger to protect the UWCs for you.
Log in to reply The following user said thank you: sunocske |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 21:39 #158157 | |
clive
2775 posts |
madaboutrains in post 158145 said:Attached a photo of the real panel.What's this "Code 2" thing and what looks like something similar related to 760? Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 21:49 #158158 | |
Stephen Fulcher
2066 posts |
Code 2 is probably an AWS fault - horn instead of a bell
Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 12/08/2024 at 22:34 #158161 | |
jc92
3675 posts |
The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?
"We don't stop camborne wednesdays" Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 13/08/2024 at 05:44 #158162 | |
0D07
88 posts |
jc92 in post 158161 said:The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year. D07 Log in to reply The following user said thank you: jc92 |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 17/08/2024 at 08:29 #158220 | |
Guts
600 posts |
0D07 in post 158162 said:jc92 in post 158161 said:Can I ask what the reason is? Not seen or heard that before.The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year. Log in to reply |
Level Crossing Protecting Signals Up & Down Lincoln 17/08/2024 at 10:48 #158224 | |
0D07
88 posts |
Guts in post 158220 said:0D07 in post 158162 said:Yeah,jc92 in post 158161 said:Can I ask what the reason is? Not seen or heard that before.The other label looks like phone scripting for temporary block working in both directions/3.5 working?3.5 Working is implemented from the 1st October till the end of the RHTT Season on that section as a matter of course. It has been for the last few years and it is listed in the Network Rail's Autumn arrangements information that we get sent every year. The reason was because the line was lightly used and to certain extent it is compared to other lines in the area despite most intermodal traffic now been taken off the ECML. The line suffered with a lot of wrong side failures even the RHTT vanished at one point on that section of line to mitigate against 3.5 was implemented every leaf fall season. The same was done between Gilberdyke and Selby trains had to clear Howden before another could be sent towards Selby. Also Castleford to Milford Jn was another area where this occurred. Was never a problem tho when the Vegetation used to be maintained regularly. Zero Delta Zero Seven Log in to reply |