Upcoming Games

No games to display

Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

Who's Online

Al McLean, kaiwhara (2 users seen recently)

TSGN

You are here: Home > Forum > Miscellaneous > The real thing (anything else rail-oriented) > TSGN

Page 1 of 1

TSGN 23/05/2014 at 11:07 #60849
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
So GOVIA have won the TSGN management contract, so is this the end of the Class 442 fleet or will they be redeployed? I quite like them on the Eastbourne to London Bridge and back rush hour turns.

http://www.govia.info/news/2014-news/govia-awarded-tsgn-franchise/

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 11:17 #60850
njimiller
Avatar
138 posts
Looks clear their relatively short life on GatEx services will be ending but could it be possible (or how easy and expensive is it) to convert them for use on the newly electrified overhead wire routes in the north?

Nick

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 13:04 #60855
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:
Looks clear their relatively short life on GatEx services will be ending but could it be possible (or how easy and expensive is it) to convert them for use on the newly electrified overhead wire routes in the north?

Nick
Technically GatEx ended before the 442s transferred over to Southern.

Also, I can't see them being suitable up here unless they have better acceleration, I recall them occasionally being substituted for a 377 and they lost time due to their lack of acceleration, though AC might give them a bit more oomph, maybe there's a longer run they'd be happy on, but they're useless as a frequently stopping commuter train. Also, don't they have guage issues?

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 13:40 #60858
hayleysmith
Avatar
14 posts
Here's a wacky idea: why not let SWT have them back for a song (SWT love a bargain and they'll be as cheap as chips 'cos no-one else will want them) and deploy them on the Weymouths, thus releasing 444s for the Pompeys, thus releasing some 450s for outer-suburban stuff and Guildford-Ascots. Just a thought
Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 13:45 #60859
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
" said:
Here's a wacky idea: why not let SWT have them back for a song (SWT love a bargain and they'll be as cheap as chips 'cos no-one else will want them) and deploy them on the Weymouths, thus releasing 444s for the Pompeys, thus releasing some 450s for outer-suburban stuff and Guildford-Ascots. Just a thought :)
History reversing itself, I love it lol

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 13:50 #60860
Peter Bennet
Avatar
5362 posts
" said:
" said:
Looks clear their relatively short life on GatEx services will be ending but could it be possible (or how easy and expensive is it) to convert them for use on the newly electrified overhead wire routes in the north?

Nick
Technically GatEx ended before the 442s transferred over to Southern.
We had this dicussion before. Gatwick Express is a trading name of Southern; or as the TSGN ITT put it:

Quote:
It will encompass the separate Thameslink/Great Northern
franchise currently operated by First Capital Connect (FCC) and the
South Central franchise currently operated by Southern and
incorporating the Gatwick Express branded services.
Peter

I identify as half man half biscuit - crumbs!
Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 13:55 #60861
Hooverman
Avatar
306 posts
" said:
" said:
Looks clear their relatively short life on GatEx services will be ending but could it be possible (or how easy and expensive is it) to convert them for use on the newly electrified overhead wire routes in the north?

Nick
Technically GatEx ended before the 442s transferred over to Southern.
I far as I'm aware Gatwick Express although part of GOVIA's Southern franchise still operates as a separate entity, it certainly has it own drivers link, branding and ticket restrictions. The amount of times we have late running and we are left waiting for the Southern driver to work the rush hour service beyond Gatwick to Brighton is certainly to not a rare event nor is it when the return ECS come back to up from Brighton and we are left waiting crew relief at Gatwick as well.

Last edited: 23/05/2014 at 13:56 by Hooverman
Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 17:01 #60863
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:

Gatwick Express is a trading name of Southern;
Not quite, Gatwick Express is only a brand of Southern, the trading name for Southern Railway Limited....

" said:

t certainly has it own drivers link, branding and ticket restrictions.
I'm unsure on whether that the 442 drivers only sign those units, or whether there are people that drive other Southern units that occasionally run the 442s, branding has changed a lot, there's no more 'Gatwick' on the side of the units, and I think only the conductors have GX uniforms, drivers and catering staff have Southern uniforms.

Ticketing restrictions are a bit of an interesting one, Southern have always issued 'goodwill gestures' to people charged excesses for using 'SOUTHERN ONLY' tickets.

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 17:07 #60864
benstafford
Avatar
88 posts
Surely someone must be pleased to see the back of 313s on the Moorgate Inners.
Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 17:08 #60865
benstafford
Avatar
88 posts
Also yippee. Looks like Southern extended rather than FCC extended.
Log in to reply
The following users said thank you: Hooverman, Gwasanaethau
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 18:58 #60869
Gwasanaethau
Avatar
509 posts
" said:

" said:

t certainly has it own drivers link, branding and ticket restrictions.
I'm unsure on whether that the 442 drivers only sign those units, or whether there are people that drive other Southern units that occasionally run the 442s, branding has changed a lot, there's no more 'Gatwick' on the side of the units, and I think only the conductors have GX uniforms, drivers and catering staff have Southern uniforms…
Drivers wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services. 442s on other services (I would imagine) are driven by drivers and worked-on by guards in Southern uniforms. Whether these are the same people that normally wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services, I really wouldn’t know.

I am not sure what you mean by ‘catering staff’ as the buffets have been removed for quite some time now.

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 19:13 #60870
Sacro
Avatar
1171 posts
" said:

Drivers wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services.
Yes, that's tautological.

" said:

442s on other services (I would imagine) are driven by drivers and worked-on by guards in Southern uniforms. Whether these are the same people that normally wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services, I really wouldn’t know.
GatEx uniforms would be Southern uniforms, though perhaps not "Southern" branded, I'm unsure whether people work both.

" said:
I am not sure what you mean by ‘catering staff’ as the buffets have been removed for quite some time now.
This was reading an old post on the matter, I didn't realise they'd stopped the catering!

Log in to reply
TSGN 23/05/2014 at 19:33 #60871
Gwasanaethau
Avatar
509 posts
" said:
" said:

Drivers wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services.
Yes, that's tautological.

Indeed. However, you mentioned that the drivers on GatEx services wore Southern uniforms. They don’t. They wear GatEx uniforms.


" said:
" said:

442s on other services (I would imagine) are driven by drivers and worked-on by guards in Southern uniforms. Whether these are the same people that normally wear GatEx uniforms on GatEx services, I really wouldn’t know.
GatEx uniforms would be Southern uniforms, though perhaps not "Southern" branded, I'm unsure whether people work both.
Whilst true, you did differentiate between “GX uniforms” and “Southern uniforms” in your previous post, so I was merely continuing with that way of referencing. Apologies for the confusion. If you want, you can indeed substitute ‘branded’ into my quote as this is what I meant.


" said:
" said:
I am not sure what you mean by ‘catering staff’ as the buffets have been removed for quite some time now.
This was reading an old post on the matter, I didn't realise they'd stopped the catering!

Fair enough. B) I am not sure when they were removed. Definitely after the 442s had been on the Gatwick services for a time, but it is certainly years since they were removed. (According to Wikipedia this started around 2008, so actually not as long after they moved as I originally thought.)

Log in to reply