Upcoming Games

No games to display

Full list
Add a game

Upcoming Events

No events to display

West Anglia Sim

You are here: Home > Forum > Wishlist > Simulation wish list > West Anglia Sim

Page 1 of 1

West Anglia Sim 13/12/2014 at 19:18 #66607
03piggs
Avatar
68 posts
I know that this sim would be difficult due to being under liverpool street iecc, but would it be possible pre-2001 when the line was under control of many box's like bishops stortford, brimsdown, Cheshunt, Broxbourne and the like?

would be interesting to see this done, as this is a VERY busy line.

Last edited: 13/12/2014 at 19:30 by 03piggs
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 16/12/2014 at 10:37 #66723
kbarber
Avatar
1712 posts
" said:
I know that this sim would be difficult due to being under liverpool street iecc, but would it be possible pre-2001 when the line was under control of many box's like bishops stortford, brimsdown, Cheshunt, Broxbourne and the like?

would be interesting to see this done, as this is a VERY busy line.
Oohhh yes!! And the sadists among the developers can code the Westronic that worked (sometimes) Clapton Junction from Hackney Downs, complete with its habit of 'flashing' (brief total failures) when a down Chingford ECS ran through the neutral section under full power

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: Prof Jolly
West Anglia Sim 16/12/2014 at 11:57 #66729
clive
Avatar
2738 posts
" said:
I know that this sim would be difficult due to being under liverpool street iecc, but would it be possible pre-2001 when the line was under control of many box's like bishops stortford, brimsdown, Cheshunt, Broxbourne and the like?

would be interesting to see this done, as this is a VERY busy line.
Usual answer: can you provide the detailed data that would be needed?

Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 16/12/2014 at 16:06 #66734
58050
Avatar
2650 posts
Clive wrote:
Quote:
Usual answer: can you provide the detailed data that would be needed?

Give me a couple of week & I'll see what I can come up with. Apart from someone I know who has contacts within Network Rail, if I can contact some of the people I worked with in Liverpool Street control during the early 1990s might be able to come up eityh something. I'll trawl through my collection of signalling notices to see if I have any relevant schematics.

Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 16/12/2014 at 17:45 #66737
Superpicop
Avatar
11 posts
I have signal track circuit and point diagrams circa liverpool street taken over if this helps?
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 31/12/2014 at 05:11 #67224
adson3492
Avatar
3 posts
Trains from the harbour do not enter as timetabled. When I look into it says no path between Ardrossan Town and Ardrossan South beach.
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 31/12/2014 at 05:11 #67225
adson3492
Avatar
3 posts
Trains from the harbour do not enter as timetabled. When I look into it says no path between Ardrossan Town and Ardrossan South beach.
I cannot find which location is missing.

Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 09:53 #75131
NewBuildmini432
Avatar
48 posts
Cambridge is part of West Anglia route. Unless you want a bit of London.
Class 150/2 approaching towards Welshpool. Wrong train you got, only 158's are fitted with ERTMS.
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 12:11 #75132
DaveHarries
Avatar
1267 posts
" said:
Cambridge is part of West Anglia route. Unless you want a bit of London.

Thinking of Cambridge I wouldn't say no to the addition, if it one day became possible, of Ely - Norwich via. Attleborough post resignalling. That could, in turn, give rise to a chain (East Anglia - London Kings Cross) if Norwich - Great Yarmouth & Lowestoft were ever done as a one-player in the future.

Just a thought.

Dave

EDIT: Having said that there are not many signals on the Ely - Norwich route.

Last edited: 15/08/2015 at 12:49 by DaveHarries
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 12:44 #75133
jc92
Avatar
3629 posts
" said:
Cambridge is part of West Anglia route. Unless you want a bit of London.
Ive always thought liverpool street power box would be a great 2 Sim all by itself but its getting the interlocking info thats the thorn in its side

"We don't stop camborne wednesdays"
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 13:36 #75134
clive
Avatar
2738 posts
" said:

Thinking of Cambridge I wouldn't say no to the addition, if it one day became possible, of Ely - Norwich via. Attleborough post resignalling.
I've got some information, so it might happen when I do the conversion to Loader.

Log in to reply
The following user said thank you: DaveHarries
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 15:50 #75138
Steamer
Avatar
3922 posts
" said:
" said:
Cambridge is part of West Anglia route. Unless you want a bit of London.

Thinking of Cambridge I wouldn't say no to the addition, if it one day became possible, of Ely - Norwich via. Attleborough post resignalling. That could, in turn, give rise to a chain (East Anglia - London Kings Cross) if Norwich - Great Yarmouth & Lowestoft were ever done as a one-player in the future.

Just a thought.

Dave

EDIT: Having said that there are not many signals on the Ely - Norwich route.
There's more signals there than you'd think! Before the resignalling, there were nine mechanical boxes, and all but two supervising Level Crossings.

The Norwich end of the line would likely form part of a Colchester simulation (Conflict of Interest permitting), then as you say a Norwich (exclusive)- Sherringham, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft simulation. Incidentally, my holiday this year was (partly) based around the Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft lines. In terms of signalling, it's fantastic- plenty of boxes and plenty of semaphores. Be sure to visit before they go.

"Don't stress/ relax/ let life roll off your backs./ Except for death and paying taxes/ everything in life.../ is only for now." (Avenue Q)
Log in to reply
West Anglia Sim 15/08/2015 at 17:07 #75139
DaveHarries
Avatar
1267 posts
" said:
I've got some information, so it might happen when I do the conversion to Loader.

When that happens it happens. But I will look forward to it.

Dave

Log in to reply